Thursday, May 7, 2009

Hey, I know this guy!


















Vote on your favourite abductor:



92 comments:

Eme said...

¡Bravo, Clàudia!

Cláudia said...

Olá, Eme!
Ou são a mesma pessoa ou são gémeos! :-)
Besos!

Anonymous said...

Boa! É mesmo o Homem.
Até convém por ser da B. desenhada da Tv de USA! Está de acordo! Bom olho!

maria

Cláudia said...

Olá, Maria.
Eu sabia que já tinha visto aquela cara! :-)

Gina said...

Unbelievable, is that sketch supposed to be the great new evidence that we have all been waiting for to be shown on C4 tonight. Did PDL have an "ugly bloke" convention going on at the time as it seems every sketch we get is of either a scary tooth man, a no face at all man, the hairy monster man, and now we have acne man. I would have thought with the amount of funds available they could have at least had a proper photofit made. Nobody would recognise this guy from this sketch even if he were standing on their foot, and no chance at all if he has had a hair cut and his acne treated.

Whether the McCanns are innocent or guilty IMO they should get some new advisors because continuing to churn out this type of rubbish under the banner of new evidence is turning this whole sad affair into a total farse

J J said...

Claudia.

I thought it was only us English who were sarcastic!

Cláudia said...

Gina, this guy exists. And I hope he sues... And I'm saying no more. :-)

Cláudia said...

Hi, JJ!
Certainly not. :-)

Gina said...

Claudia does this guy clean pools!!

Cláudia said...

Gina, I don't know.
What I do know is that some people should be smart enough to know that the files available to the public are not exactly the same as the files still kept in secrecy of justice. There are things that weren't made public but that exist...

Gina said...

What files did the McCanns have access to. I thought I read that the were following up things the PJ had not bothered with or something like that

Cláudia said...

Gina, from what I heard they have the files everyones has! LOL Which explains a lot...

Gina said...

Well if acne man actually exists and he has already been checked out and cleared, I hope he speaks up for himself and gets this latest "sighting" out of way. Someone has to be guilty, but there are just too many innocent people who have been dragged into this way one or another

Cláudia said...

Hi, Gina.
I have a feeling you won't have to wait long to see your wish come true.

Anonymous said...

Hi Sadie
Mum21 Today at 3:34 pm


My copy arrived today too....and I pushed aside all jobs I was supposed to do, and sat down and read it from cover to cover.
The book is fantastic...very well written and a credit to all involved.
If this does not shake up Portugal...then nothing will.
Very well done to all of you.
Mum21
Newbie




Number of posts: 13
Location: West Sussex
Registration date: 2009-05-02

..................................
Everybody on the forum is buying the book, everybody on the forum says they did not write the book, everybody on the forum is congratulating everyone else for their contribution to the book, and nobody knows what it says until the read it so how do they know that it is worth congratulations?????

nancy said...

Hi Claudia -

Maddie's photo is all over the press today - front page on some. There can't be much other news at the moment!

I'm going to watch "The Cutting Edge" tonight, because it's later than I first thought at 9.00pm. I'm sure the new sighting will get a mention as it's all in the news too.

Why did they take so long to reveal this photo?

Cláudia said...

Anon,

ROTFLMAO!!!
Their IQ is lower than that of a rock! PMSL! Thanks for that. I wouldn't have read it if it wasn't for you!

Cláudia said...

Nancy, they took two years to reveal it but will take a lot less to regret it. ;-)

Anonymous said...

Hi all,

Gina - someone had definitely been around with the ugly stick in PdL that week ;-) I keep waiting for the day when we get a sketch of Harrison Ford :D I could do with a free wall poster!

JJ - sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, supposedly, but I use it all of the time - wonder what that says about me?!!

Nancy, I'll give you the low-down on CE after I've seen it. Can't say I'm looking forward to it though, I like to be able to keep my dinner down ;-)

Dylan xxx

Maria C.Lopes said...

Claudia, devo assumir que estou indecisa na escolha...

o meu coração balança entre o 5,6, 11, 12 e 14

jitos

Cláudia said...

Oh filha, tu nem me digas nada, mulher. Estou com a cabeça em água e ainda não me consegui decidir... :-)
Muitos beijinhos!

Mercedes y Mila said...

Errr arrr Let me see...

Let me have another look ;-)

Mercedes

Cláudia said...

Hola, Mercedes!
Aren't they all lovely? And the good thing is that they are all so different that you can choose according to your preferences. :-)
Besos!

Eme said...

Donde esté el 12... Qué cromo de hombre...

Marie(f) said...

Olà Claudia

qual serà o mais jeitoso? nenhum é parecido com o Clooney ...acho que os vou deixar todos pra Kate ...deve ter fome :-))

Beijinhos

Cláudia said...

O 12 é lindo, não é, Eme? :-)

Cláudia said...

Olá, Marie!
Não está nada fácil escolher entre tantas beldades. Se calhar é mesmo melhor deixá-los todos para ela! :-)
Jinhos!

bath theory said...

Claudia the programme is on at the moment and so far it is unconvincing completely to those who understand the inconsistencies.

Gerry's skin seems very spotty

Cláudia said...

Hi, BAth Theory.
Thanks for the feedback.
xxxx

Gina said...

I just watched most of the programme and if I had not been following all the pros and cons of this case it was quite convincing. It showed the Smiths sighting and they also said that the PJ had checked out their claim that they thought it was Gerry and had dismissed it.

I just cannot understand why they never went along with an official reconstruction and have waited two years to do their own, that just no make sense to me at all.

My vote - the one with the big nose, take your pick! eg pick your own nose!!

Cláudia said...

Because the were effing scared? :-)
I still can't make my mind. So many handsome men... ;-)

Anonymous said...

When one though that the sumum of ridicule and mediocrity had been reached, one can still be proved wrong, minha menina de Viseu! I could not believe when I saw the portrait of “the handsome one” today on several newspapers here in London. People in the City were laughing their heads off. Two bankers asked me if we still accepted British tourists in Portugal after this farce...and the two bankers are very very English, by the way.
The circus had to come back to town in great f..king splendour. One understands why. If I were who they are, I would be also very worried about the way Dr Gonçalo Amaral is little by little arising awareness in different European countries. If I were who they are, I would be seriously worried about what is to come next. Soon.
beijinhos

Anonymous said...

P.S. Sorry my dear, I forgot to tell you how frustrating it is to have all these hugely gorgeous men to chose from...
You see, there are moments when a girl just feels lost for words.
So much virility on display! All dark, tall and handsome! Poor Mr Darcy, how jaleous he might be.

Cláudia said...

Hi, minha linda!
You mean none of them were able to steal your heart? ;-)
Rir vou eu rir quando este senhor 'aparecer'. Eu cá, no lugar dele, atacava o fundo com uma limpeza, que nem te digo nem te conto! :-)
Your friends are clearly intelligent people. And we have nothing against tourists from any nationality. As long as hey are the McCann type, of course. Those are best left living in the middle of the desert.
have you read the French press today? Very, very interesting. I was proud. :-)
Mil beijinhos!!!

Gina said...

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/madeleine-was-here

I am not sure if they are putting the film on there soon but I could not believe that there is episode 2 on the 11th, "how the McCanns are coping".

This is all too much now, this poor missing child is being turned into a soap opera

Cláudia said...

Hi, Gina.
Thanks. It's like 'Rocky' and its sequels. But it makes sense. The second part must be intended to boost the fund. :-)
xxxx

Anonymous said...

I did read the French press and I was also very very proud. French tend to be a well informed and educated lot. A bit difficult to make them believe in "tretas"....kisses xxxxx

Gina said...

Why are there no programmes on how other parents with no help, interest or support are coping, are these other kids not important. This really annoys me, going to bed in a huff!!

Cláudia said...

I struggled a bit with my 9th grade French, but it was enough to be proud. :-)
Mil beijinhos!

Cláudia said...

Because their surname is not McCann.
Don't let it get to you.
Sleep well.

mandarinn said...

Olá Claudia and everybody
Thank you Claudia for allow us to see the complete gallery of "abductors" who was in PDL by the time. Almost all of them look ugly enough to scare a child , my vote goes to the hairy guy (antepenultimo).
It seems to me very odd all those guys in a small village gazing to the apartments ...actually the only problem is to choose who of them is the Abductor.
bjs

Anonymous said...

Well what a load of cobblers that was! Mushy, gushy pathos with a hint of 'wooshed'!

I watched it with my daughter and her fiancé. She said; (when Gerry first wen back to the complex), "Why hasn't he broken down in tears?". For a man who lost his daughter there two years ago, he was remarkably self-controlled and cold, IMO.

Again, when Kate is directing her speech as a plea to "someone who knows or has information", she does not look into the camera.
It may have fooled a lot of people, but it didn't fool me or my daughter who hasn't followed the case at all.
Boy do I wish we could have GA's docu broadcasted this time, next week. I'm sick of seeing our entire media sucking up to these neglectful parents. When will the spin ever stop? If I hear one more time "we should have been there at the moment she [Madeleine] was taken." I think I will tear my own hair out! One last time to G & K: You should not have left them at all! It's the only way to guarantee that the children are safe from all sorts of dangers. I dare you to admit to the world that you were totally stupid doctors who should have known better and then list all of the other (more likely) accidents that could befall a child other than a bl@@dy ugly abductor carrying him or her off. BTW, how convenient that they are all so ugly. If I had to take my pick, it would be eggman, then I could just paint the face on that I desire ;-)

Dylan xxx

Anonymous said...

PS. What did the French press say?

Dylan xxx

Cláudia said...

Hi, Mandarinn!
Great to read you! :-)
I think there was an abductor convention that week in PdL.
Still don't know who to choose. It's so damn difficult. If only I could have them all. :-)
Beijos!

Cláudia said...

Hi, Dylan.
Thank you for the feedback on the Mockumentary.
well, to make a long story short, let's just say that the French press did the opposite of the British one. Mr Amaral was there for two days and interviewed by some of the most important titles.
Sleep well! :-)
xxxx

Mila said...

Saludos a todos.

Ya no sé si cada vez el secuestrador es "mejor" o "peor".

Tu que piensas Claudia?

Un abrazo.

Niza said...

"The book is fantastic...very well written and a credit to all involved.
If this does not shake up Portugal...then nothing will.
Very well done to all of you.
Mum21"

Yes, we need more toilet paper in Portugal to wipe up sh... her friends leave behind (asses).

Gina said...

Good morning all

Just a few observations I made from last nights film. I did not see the beginning, but I thought the scene of Gerry making milk shakes with the twins was totally stage managed and unnecessary.

JT & GM could not even agree where he was standing at the time JT saw the abductor, and the investigator said that that did not matter. I would have thought it did matter in order to get the scene correct.

You could clearly see the abductor carrying the child and that is because the street lamps have been changed in the area and are much brighter than they were at the time, so we did not see a true picture of how clearly or not what JT could have seen from the distance she was standing.

It is my understanding that the Smiths claimed that when Gerry got off of the plane he was carrying the child in the same way as the abductor was. This was not the way it was shown, he was still carrying the child in the same way JT said.

Gerry went into the apartment and turned the light on in the bedroom and told how he had stood there and thought how lovely Madeleine was (or whatever). There was no reconstruction of that, and I am wondering if he turned the light on to see the kids as I thought that would have woken them, and if he did not, just how clearly could anyone see inside the room.

It has been reported that the Smiths thought the man they saw was Gerry and the film said that this was checked out and he was cleared. Anybody can make a mistake but I am wondering if the Smiths have been asked their opinion on this latest “acne man” sketch who clearly was not Gerry and I do not think anybody would have made such a huge mistake.

Personally I do not think this reconstruction will change the mind of anybody who has been following this case from the start although I do not think that was the reason for making it. As Kate said, she is past caring what people think!

Gina said...

BTW I forgot to say: The investigator had sketches from witnesses of where they were standing and other people were standing so I would have presume the same applied to JT & GM, yet they wait till they get there and debate their differences on camera. Did anybody bother to ask the guy Gerry was talking to to confirm where he thought they were standing. Just a minor point, but IMO if you are going to do a reconstruction then at least try to get the positions correct otherwise what is the point of doing it at all.

helmylin2 said...

Hi Cláudia,

I don't know if is just me but a lot of those handsome men seem to have Gerry's face!

I had never seen that hairy one on the bottom third from the right before. Wonder how I missed him.

I haven't watched the show yet maybe later.

xxx

Zodiac said...

Hi Claudia and all,

'If I had to take my pick, it would be eggman, then I could just paint the face on that I desire ;-)'

Dylan,

ROFL!


I did not have time to watch the Mockumentary so I quickly had a look f/forwarding and stopping at bits to view.

Well please someone tell me did I fast forward too quickly? Where was Lisa Donovan the American actress (having read in this thread there is a part 2 perhaps she will be in that) who was playing the part of K8? Having watched K8 describe how she found the apt, I still do not believe her. I was shocked when she said that when she entered the apt all was quiet and to be honest at that point she was just going to leave. WTF! What was the point of checking then. Surely if someone decides to leave their children the way they did then they should have at least looked at the children that were left unsupervised in a holiday flat with no adult supervision! It was quiet so all was hunky dory. What if the child that had the freedom to wander about the flat had found in the parents bedroom the bag of medicine that had been wrapped up and clasped and placed in their wardrobe and that same child was sitting quietly helping herself to whatever she thought looked like sweeties. Or what if the child was quiet because of what she could have ingested? Or what if all was quiet because the child was lying behind the sofa?

I also noticed that they did not show Ernie Allen saying that using a picture of a nearly 4 yr old child two years later was not good enough however Oprah did!

The two ex policeman, when I have watched the prog properly I will comment accordingly. Although imo it looked like they were bunnies in the headlights reading their scripts at times! The ex policeman saying to JT that it did not matter where G was standing there are always lots of inconsistencies in statements. Hmm so Arguido and Arguida statements do not matter! J and G jovially disputing where they thought they were standing so what do we see depicted in the reconstruction, where G said they were standing! Did JT forget to tell the PJ she also saw the abductor walking down the street and she saw him from behind with the little blonde girl quite visible! Also it is quite clear that they used the same actor for M Smith's sighting. M Smith said his abductor had short brown hair Swarthy man had longer hair and it is quite visibly longer hair when you see their actor in the Smith sighting. Talking of reconstruction did I miss that also was it not more of a bits of their story here and bits of the lovely remaining family homelife living without M here, the American Apple Pie new image being shown now and then as the missing part of the lovely jigsaw that is findable and life goes on waiting for this piece to be found and popped into place and life is lovely in the lovely family home once more! I also noticed that when G was being filmed walking to the Tapas Bar it quite conveniently showed him just approaching the entrance to the MW resort then walking to the Tapas Bar (quite a distance and I do not know if that was edited to imply it was shorter) and describing where they were sitting. Why did we not see him walking from the exit of the apt to his seat? Oops silly me because it is not like dining in the back garden more like leaving the kids at home and going to the local Wine Bar for dinner and drinks with friends! I also notice that the view from Tapas to flat was a lot different from what I have seen in the public domain. The bushes were much lower than anything I have seen and he says they were lower again! The part where G and MO are in the apt is in their word ludicrous! What does, Madeleine was here mean?

Cláudia said...

Olá, Mila!
Eu penso que o último 'sequestrador' é mesmo o pior. :-)
Besos e abrazos!

Cláudia said...

Hi, Niza!
ROTFLMAO!
Muitos beijinhos!

Cláudia said...

Hi, Gina and Zodiac.

Thank you very much for sharing your opinions and talking about the inconsistencies. I see that some miracles were performed in this mockumentary. Good. They may be useful. :-)
xxx

Cláudia said...

Hi, Helmy!
Don't watch it after having eaten! :-)
xxxx

Anonymous said...

Great posts guys :-)

I heard the mocku say that the McCanns were cleared of any guilt when the case was shelved. Arrrggghhh! The case was shelved under death and concealment of a cadaver. Where in that does it say they are innocent? Cutting edge used to be just that. After this, I think they have lost their "edge"!

The programme showed one of the posters that had been daubed with paint. Again, very selective, they could have shown one of them with comments on, which, from memory, suggested that they shouldn't have left her in the first place.

When GM said that he looked at his daughter and had a "proud father moment", what the hell was he thinking of? Did he think that it would make us warm to him? NO! It does exactly the oppposite! It made me think that after having had that thought, what a cruel and callous b*stard he was to then walk back out of that appartment. I was furious!

Thanks for the French news Cláudia, how i wish our country had the b*lls to do the same :(

Have a lovely weekend all.

Dylan xxx

Zodiac said...

Just read this on 3 A's posted by Interzone:

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 243550.ece

Cutting Edge: Madeleine Was Here (Channel 4)


There is a very macabre dance around Madeleine McCann, as we mark the second anniversary of her disappearance. There are no law enforcement agencies on the case. Instead, alongside Kate, Madeleine’s mother, two retired detectives are poring over recently released Portuguese police files. Last night’s Cutting Edge was called Madeleine Was Here and — to keep yesterday’s pre-transmission front pages furnished — revealed a suspect from deep within the files; a man who was, according to witnesses, watching the McCann’s Praia da Luz apartment.

Gerry returned to the apartment block and some reconstructions were filmed. Last week, the McCanns appeared on The Oprah Winfrey Show with a computer-generated image of how their daughter would appear now.

To keep the chances of finding her alive, the McCanns have to keep the story alive, and Cutting Edge observed the McCanns at home: a picture of determinedly amiable domestic life emerged. But the family is uncomfortably beached between a desire for privacy and a desire for as much publicity as possible to find Madeleine.

This presents a problem for them, and for documentary-makers and journalists. The dripfeed of information (like the new suspect) and access to the McCanns is controlled by the family and their press representative Clarence Mitchell. The journalism of the Cutting Edge documentary was thus skewed to whatever the McCann’s agenda was. It was hard to see what material Cutting Edge had uncovered itself: it seemed to just record whatever the McCanns wanted us to see.

Oprah quite reasonably asked them how their marriage had survived the last two awful years. The documentary, despite its access and illusion of family intimacy, didn’t dare ask such things. When I asked Mitchell and the documentary-maker the same question at a screening on Wednesday, I received a curt dismissal: that wasn’t the intention of Madeleine Was Here, apparently.

But that doesn’t mean my question, or indeed any question is invalid just because it doesn’t fit with the McCann/Mitchell agenda, especially when TV cameras have been invited into their home to show how jolly nice everything is under the circumstances.

Kate and Gerry McCann may well feel their privacy has been invaded, but then they want the media to do their bidding on their terms. It’s a mess — a very unhappy, tragic one. The McCanns need the media and the media needs the McCanns, but it’s a scrappy, compromising relationship for both sides. Let’s hope it yields the desired result.


Gina wrote:

'Gerry went into the apartment and turned the light on in the bedroom and told how he had stood there and thought how lovely Madeleine was (or whatever). There was no reconstruction of that, and I am wondering if he turned the light on to see the kids as I thought that would have woken them, and if he did not, just how clearly could anyone see inside the room.'

Gina,

K8 said in her story when she was looking into the room, because the door was not as they had left it, that she did not turn on the light because she did not want to wake the kids up!

Hmm however she had no qualms about leaving her other two children behind to go back to the Tapas to inform everyone her eldest child had been abducted! The same apt where she just knew someone had taken her eldest child from hmm. Why would an abductor take the largest girl when there was a smaller one who could have made his exit via the window so much easier? I felt sorry for the actor who played Zitman. The Zitman pic depicts a hideous creature that actor looked nothing like their pretendy FBI photo fit. Also why would all these hideous creatures from the professional peadophile/child snatching ring be hanging around outside staring at the apt and allow themselves to be seen around PdL? What happened to hiding across the street (remember Corner and McC filming on Panorama) and monitoring the loudest happiest family in PdL?

I think this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmbklTNDU2E&feature=related

video footage an elderly tourist couple remembered taking whilst on holiday in Vulgaria, which they say is less than an hour from PdL, however they cannot remember if it was their holiday before May 07 or after as the date and time on their video camera is gubbed. They have also said the footage could be from a holiday sometime ago in the past when video camera's did not have a time and date function so it could be several years old and as they are getting on a bit they might be mistaken. However they do confirm it is Vulgaria and it is on an hour from PdL so this could be something that has been going on there for yonks! They say at the time they thought it was odd but did not think much of it until now!

Cláudia said...

Dylan, same old, same old. :-)
Have a great weekend too. :-)
xxxx

Cláudia said...

Hi, Zodiac!
Thank you. Someone asking questions??? Wow! :-)
xxxx

Anonymous said...

Hi Zodiac,

Good for The Times! More of that please!

I tried the link but it goes straight to "The child catcher". Was it supposed to be irony? I'm in dim mode today due to "ladies' things" ;-)

xxx

Niza said...

I have question for whoever see Oprah program. I not see. I am told by friend who watch this that Gerry say he go and check on children but not hear crying so not go in. Is this true? Because as Gina say, Gerry say before that "Gerry went into the apartment and turned the light on in the bedroom and told how he had stood there and thought how lovely Madeleine was (or whatever). There was no reconstruction of that, and I am wondering if he turned the light on to see the kids as I thought that would have woken them, and if he did not, just how clearly could anyone see inside the room." I think he say something of Madeleine in fetal position. Can someone inform me if this true?

Also, I told that Kate refer to Madeleine as Maddie on Oprah program. Anyone notice this? Is this true? Because if so, she had say that Madeleine not like be called Maddie.

Also like her pink shirt and pullover. I think she spent too much time with spookyman.

Cláudia said...

Hi, Niza!
Good questions. Haven't watched the mockumentary and didn't pay that much attention to Oprah, to be honest (was translating at the same time). But I'm sure one of our fantastic posters can answer your questions.

Dear friends, can you clarrriefy these questions? :-)

Beijinhos, Niza!

Zodiac said...

Hi Anon,

'I tried the link but it goes straight to "The child catcher". Was it supposed to be irony? I'm in dim mode today due to "ladies' things" ;-)'

LOL! Yes it was irony! The Child Catcher in Chitty Chitty Bang Bang!

docmac said...

Ola Claudia et al

Please forgive the long post. It has been some months since I last posted on any blog or forum. Work, family and travel commitments have mitigated against me doing so. I do look in now and again and admire the dedication of all who continue to seek the truth regarding Madeleine뭩 멶isappearance?and who believe that those responsible for her 멶isappearance?should be brought before a court of law. I hold dear my hope that this will come to pass and that Drs McCann will eventually face the wrath of public condemnation.

I never did understand the blinkered and rather na?e view of those who offer(ed) their unwavering support to all of the disgracefully neglectful parents within the Tapas 9. That they did so whilst roundly condemning Portugal, the family-orientated Portuguese people and anyone who supported them still confounds me. The more militant amongst them suggested that Portugal should be expelled from the EU, that tourists should refrain from visiting the country and even that the purchase of her produce should be banned. Where I live megalomaniacs who express such thoughts would be charged and prosecuted.

Having said that, there were a few 몆ros?that I did not regard with total disdain. Hugh, from the DX days, was a gentleman. SassyP, who eventually told the 몈ueen bee?where to get off, had guts. Tulip, who was the only one to believe that I live in SA and who also stood up to Rosiepips, was another. Um, that뭩 it, really.

Claudia can remove the following section if she so wishes. It contains my thoughts on other 몆ros??those that I remember - and may be distressing to some.

Rosiepips aka The Boss and numerous aliases (hello MsMarples): A wannabe pseudo-Christian dominatrix with an inflated sense of self worth. A serial, egotistical liar and fantasist. Believes all parents are always innocent and I quote:
밫hank God Shannon has been found and my thoughts have already turned to her welfare and my prayers for her and her family be given all the help they need to get through this. But thank God they have the chance to get her through this.?[sic]
Never, ever attacked anyone personally, if one is to believe this quote, as posted to LGC:
밄ut I know that the so called pros have been attacked more and I know this because I know I have for little or no reason and I never personally attack anyone so I do not accept your argument.?[sic] You deserved the attacks, meneer. Have you ever heard of 몁on-sequiturs?
Hobbies include inventing names, occupations and residential addresses for other posters. Extreme xenophobe and racist, votes for the BNP. Has a Master뭩 degree in everything bar quantum physics. Published author (writes a lot of letters to his local village paper, only got one printed ?may be due to all the non-sequiturs in his writing). Not one to marry. Should not be allowed anywhere near children. Or dogs. Never reads any blogs but his own pink paradise. Oh my, does he love pink. He probably turns a mild shade of pink on the one day a year he gets some rays, lol! Yes, Rosiepips, I am fascinated with you as your disciples have always said. Just not in in the way you so fervently believe. It뭩 a psychiatric thing. Any junior nurse would know that.

Mark55 aka Rainbowwarrior aka? Layabout wannabe dentist. Does not 몉ead?girlie magazines. 멪ses?car magazines instead. Vorsprung Durch Technik, Woof.

Christabel: Old hag who used to stalk me. Eeeugh! Underdog in the Rosiepips queendom.

Mum21: Another old hag who used to stalk me. Eeeugh again! Has poorly made dentures, possibly made by Mark. Or are they (badly) Photoshopped? Dreadful poet and awful artist. Rudeness personified. Loves animals but not children. Lives close to ICTOAN. Sorry, mate.

Dianeh: Lets her kid play with dog poop in the Australian outback. 멞uff said.

Alroydobywallah aka.. aka..: BNP secretary. Brains of a squid.

Nigel Nessling aka Vee8 aka?and his boyfriend): Petrolheads. Say no more.

Supertroll: Professed not to be 몆ro? yet deleted any posts not sympathetic to dear Gerry. Online translation tool addict. I뭢 still waiting for that summons to drop into my letter box. You did mention that it was a certainty, after all. Often.

Assassin: Psychotic drug-addicted porn addict.

Johncar: Collects X-files videos. Grandfather was a clerk in a police station.

Chinadoll: Dull. Pseudointellectual wannabe lawyer.

GinaM: Cleaner in a B&B in Spain. Never married.

Maureen7: Divorced, now a widow. Has had the most awful luck. Friends, family and animals died almost weekly. Yeah, right. Lonely, bitter and confused.

Oldhippy: Spaced out. As always.

JaneGT: Drunkard. Violent. Said I would die on the 26th Jan 2008. With a 멳omb on ma heed? Hello! Have another one. It뭩 on me.

Tinkerbell: Likes children뭩 stories, but not children. Way down the pecking order.

Sian: Mud for brains.

Mandz: Ditto. Intellectual lightweight. Squeak.

Calcite: Social worker living in Canada. The cold got to her.

Melbel: Cont spel. or ,punchwait proply or nuthin/; Shares her name with my wife :( ,
Joanypony: Posted a picture of her grandchild online. Rosiepips said nothing. Robbie, Sam and Kiara say hi (with their parents?express permission of course).
Clarence: Idiot.


To those of sane mind, I say hello! I will email some of you soon. I have not used that email address for some time but will check on it at the weekend. Special mention to Dylan: I was in Norfolk recently. My advice? Move :)

Regards to all

Notapractisingdocanymore :)

Cláudia said...

Hi, Doc!
I see you have studied them all during these months! LOL
I have to confess that I didn't remember most of those names. And although I recognise them now that you have written them, I have no idea about how some of them were or what they used to write.
I don't subscribe some of the opinions, but you're entitled to them, especially because some of them have had no problem judging other people and making up lies.
Having said that, they don't deserve any of us wasting our time on them. :-)
Hope I'll read you soon.
And keep texting! :-)
xxxx

docmac said...

My word. What are all those Chinese characters I see in my post onscreen?

Claudia, I can not vote on the abductor issue unless you include pics of one or several of the T9!

docmac said...

Yes, amiga. Ate logo x.

Zodiac said...

Posted by Jez on 3 A's:

http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/movie-uk-703775c886633de22742fd4eb5b535de.html

ROFL!

Cláudia said...

Hi, Amigo!
Have no idea what those are. But I can see tem too!
You're right. I neglected some of the 'abductors'. :-)
xxxx

Zodiac said...

Hi Docmac,

LOL!

Especially @ Johncar: Collects X-files videos. Grandfather was a clerk in a police station.

Cláudia said...

Hi, Zodiac!
Brilliant video! LOL
xxxx

Cláudia said...

Have to go for a bit.
See you later! :-)

Gina said...

GinaM: Cleaner in a B&B in Spain. Never married.

Married twice, retired, googled cleaning tips

Cláudia said...

Twice? A frind of my family married three times. With the same man. And I'm not joking!

Gina said...

Nearly the same thing with me Claudia, currently back with hubby 2 but not bothering to get married again!!

Anonymous said...

Hi Docmac, great to "see" you :-))

PMSL at some of your comments. I have to dash but wanted to ask one thing - What's wrong with Norfolk - huh?!! You must have gone to Yarmouth, that's all I can think of ;-))))

Dylan xxx

Cláudia said...

Hi, Gina.
I can understand that.

Cláudia said...

Have to go for a bit.
xxxx

Gina said...

This article taken from the McCann files does a far better job of explaining what I was trying to say yesterday regards my observations of the documentary, and in particular the Smith's sighting. IMO there is absolutely no point doing a reconstruction if you do not reconstruct exactly what you have been told by witnesses.

Nigel Moore
09 May 2009

We now know that the 'Ugly Man', who found himself suddenly splashed across the front pages of many UK newspapers, had already been positively identified by the PJ and eliminated as having no relevance to the inquiry. He is even named in the PJ's final 57-page report.

We know that the sketch bears no relation whatsoever to the identikit image produced at the time by the actual witness, a 12-year-old girl.

We know the 'Ugly Man' sketch was drawn from the description contained in the PJ files by someone completely unrelated to the case.

We know the girl described the man as having short, fair hair, about 1cm in length - yet the sketch produced shows a full head of dark, longer hair.

We know that the 'Ugly Man' sketch was not even shown to the 3 witnesses prior to its widespread publication.

So, having no investigative or forensic value, why was it produced?

Could the answer lie in the sudden acknowledgment, by the McCanns, of the Smith family sighting? A sighting they have known about for some time but have previously sought to distance themselves from.

The Channel 4 documentary, 'Madeleine Was Here', stated that the sighting had been linked to Gerry McCann but that this had been dismissed by the PJ. It was not stated that Martin Smith was 60-80% certain that the man he saw that night carrying a child was Gerry McCann.

In the reconstruction of the Smith family sighting, the way the child was carried was similar to the Tanner sighting; held horizontally in an extremely awkward and uncomfortable way. This was grossly misleading and a deliberate attempt to consciously link the two sightings.

The Smith family sighting was unequivocal. The child was carried vertically with the head against the carrier's shoulder. It was this particular way of carrying the child that shocked Martin Smith when he saw Gerry McCann on the BBC news - with a sleeping Sean in his arms -when the McCanns returned to the UK.

The McCanns' latest pair of detectives now believe that there were two people involved in the 'abduction' and that the man seen by Jane Tanner was NOT the 'Ugly Man'.

Therefore the door has been left open to the possibility that the man seen by the Smith family, despite not matching Tanner's description, was, nevertheless, still involved in the 'abduction'.

So, the question is, has this sketch been produced to marry this 'Ugly Man' to the Smith sighting and negate any discussion that the man seen by the Smith family, carrying a lifeless child, was, in fact, Gerry McCann?

Nothing more than a simple case of mistaken identity.

Cláudia said...

Hi, Gina!
Thanks!
Great article!

Pericles Pinto said...

Please read my post at 'Muito suave' about one of Gerry's answers at the Oprah Winfrey show.

http://muitosuave.blogspot.com/2009/05/gerry-and-kate-at-oprah-winfrey-show.html

Feel free to leave your comments.

Cláudia said...

Thanks for the link, Péricles.

helmylin2 said...

Hi Cláudia,

Just who do these people think they are? Another inocent person being hounded and more or less accused. How can they get by with this sort of thing?

I hope this blows up in their faces big time.

I finally watched that show. Don't think I will bother with the 11 of May one. One can only stomach so much bull hockey and I think I've had my fill. xxx

Cláudia said...

Hi, Helmy!
I still haven't watched it. Will leave it for when I'm depressed! :-)
Have a great weekend!
xxxx

Niza said...

Claudia, I read in mccannfiles that there is Sun article on how gypsy fair guy in portugal was under surveillance by mccann detectives, including taking pictures of him undercover, following him, etc. If this true, this very serious. It is illegal for anyone not police to do this. We must do something! We cannot keep allow them to step on our people and laws and think they do whatever they want. Who they think they are, come here, and start surveillance on portuguese nationals? I think we need to join for once, and tell our politicians WE NO LONGER ACCEPT THAT THEY LET MCCANNS RUN PORTUGAL. I so sick of that spookeyman and them that I want puke everytime I see their ugly faces on t.v. Maldito o dia que aquela gente xunga pôs os pés no nosso país! I damn the day those people place their feet on our soil. They pollute our world with their ugliness.

Cláudia said...

Hi, Niza!
But my questions is: is that true? Because I don't believe a word that comes from those people or the people who are paid by them. And unless someone I can believe guarantees that is true, I'll treat it as I treat everything coming from TM, as a lie. :-)
Beijinhos!

Niza said...

I hope is lie, Claudia, because if true, very very serious. I so mad. But you probably right. Probably more like when Gerry say on Oprah that no police investigating Madeline disappearance anymore and forgot to tell Oprah that he could have asked for case reopened and NEVER BOTHERED TO. Also, I like to mention that no mention of the reward was made, when they on a programme that appears in 144 different countries. To me, that say it all. If really interested and believe there daughter out there and someone have information, why they not mention reward? Why? Reward was millionaire reward. Even evil people, which normally greedy, would right away say everything they know to get the money. But they not mention it. Horrible, evil, nasty wolves disguised as human beings.

Niza said...

Sorry Claudia I so mad when I remember that trash that I forget manners. Beijinho and nice weekend.

Cláudia said...

No problem, Niza! :-)
And the points you made, very, very relevant! :-)
xxxx

Cláudia said...

Just sprayed an insect. What a stench.
Doc, you have the ability to resurrect the dead, my friend! ;-)

Anonymous said...

Hi all,

Hope you are all having/ have had a lovely weekend.

Niza, I don't blame you for saying what you did. I'm really angry for the Portuguese and enough, really is enough. I don't even live there either! I don't know who they think the are. I bet Gerry runs for prime minister next year!

Gina, thanks for the article and comment - how true? Where did you find it? Was it in the press or somewhere online?

Dylan xxx

Gina said...

Dylan I found it on the McCann files written by Nigel Moore